Triumph Daytona 675 R
                  Triumph Daytona 675 R




Fuel Efficieny: 46 MPG City / 50 MPG Highway
Engine: Liquid-cooled, 12 valve, DOHC, in-line 3-cylinder
Frame: Aluminum beam twin-spar
Rear Suspension: Öhlins TTX36 twin tube monoshock with piggy back reservoir, adjustable preload, rebound and compression damping, 130mm rear wheel travel
Instruments: LCD multi-functional instrument pack with digital speedometer, trip computer, analogue tachometer, lap timer, gear position indicator and programmable gear change lights








Posted by :Andrea

Cartagena,
 Spain—Having been on the job and in the saddle for the 
turn-of-the-century debut of the Triumph TT600, I can appreciate just 
how far the Hinckley, England-based firm has progressed since its 
inaugural foray into the highly competitive middleweight supersport 
class. The inline-Four TT and Daytona 600 that followed have become a 
distant memory, erased by the 2006 introduction of the Daytona 675.
Seemingly
 overnight, that track-bred, technically advanced, fuel-injected, 
inline-Triple established Triumph as the performance leader in the 
class. Despite the bike’s sales success and magazine accolades, Triumph 
knew from the beginning that the Daytona 675 was an underachiever of 
sorts. At the time of the bike’s inception, under-tail exhaust was 
important from a sales and marketing standpoint, but it compromised 
chassis geometry and weight distribution.
The
 2013 Daytona 675 and 675R models rectify that, with an all-new 
stainless steel exhaust system and a host of engine and chassis updates 
that include anti-lock brakes and sharp, new styling with a 
higher-quality finish and better attention to detail. Triumph’s Product 
Manager, Simon Warburton, said this major makeover has provided the 
foundation for the next phase of Daytona 675 development.
When
 questioned about the absence of electronic rider aids such as 
selectable delivery maps or traction control, Warburton says Triumph 
feels no need for such “gimmicks.” He did, however, say that such 
systems make good sense if ride-by-wire technology is implemented in the
 future to meet more stringent emissions regulations.
I
 had the opportunity to spend a day stretching the throttle cable of a 
new Triumph Daytona 675R at the bike’s world press launch, held at 
Circuito Cartagena on the Mediterranean coast of Spain. The R model 
comes equipped with a race-spec Öhlins NIX30 fork and TTX shock, plus 
Brembo Monobloc front calipers and radial master cylinder, a 
quickshifter and carbon-fiber fenders.

Lapping
 the 2.2-mile track at speed revealed a dramatic improvement in chassis 
balance, agility and feedback. The claimed three horsepower boost felt 
subtle, but the focus has been in smoothing midrange torque. Fueling was
 excellent, offering tractable delivery and good control.
The
 engine is an all-new design with a shorter stroke and 2mm bore increase
 that allows 500 additional revs, pushing the redline to 14,400 rpm. The
 separate alloy cylinder block with Nikasil-coated bores is stronger 
than its predecessor’s one-piece upper crankcase with pressed-in liners.
 The added strength allows higher combustion pressure for increased 
torque and power, illustrated by the bump in compression ratio from 12.6
 to 13.1
Other
 changes include revised valve timing and increased lift, thanks to 
lighter valves. The exhaust is 1.3mm smaller in diameter than before, 
and the intakes are now made of titanium and have reshaped backside 
contours for improved flow. What’s more, the crankshaft and alternator 
rotor carried on one end are lighter, reducing inertia for snappier 
engine response.
A
 redesigned gear selector mechanism, which includes a new shift drum and
 forks, works with revised first and second cogs to deliver lighter and 
more precise gear changes. The clutch has been upgraded to a slip/assist
 design that reduces lever effort by 25 percent and quells 
engine-braking-induced rear wheel hop during deceleration. A tooth off 
the countershaft sprocket has lowered final gearing for improved 
acceleration, yet top speed remains roughly the same due to the 
increased rev ceiling.
Speaking
 with lead test rider/chassis engineer David Lopez, the man whose 
fingerprints are all over the 675, helped my own understanding of some 
finer details. The pro-level racer said the lighter wheels and die-cast 
subframe, along with the aforementioned exhaust, have all contributed to
 moving weight forward. The 52.9-percent front bias (it was formerly 
51.8) allows the use of quicker steering geometry and a shorter 
wheelbase (54.1 inches versus 55.0) without inducing stability issues.

The
 frame headstock has been extended slightly forward, making room between
 the front wheel and engine to accommodate a steeper rake angle of 23 
degrees, sharpened from 23.9. The trail measurement of 87.7mm is 1.4mm 
less than before, and the cast aluminum swingarm is 15mm shorter, with 
an asymmetric shape that allows the low muffler to be tucked tightly for
 exceptional cornering clearance.
Predictably,
 relocating the exhaust system has provoked a hint of dissent from the 
675’s fan base, but not to the degree Triumph encountered when it 
restyled the iconic headlights on its Speed Triple. And all told, I 
prefer the new look of the bike.
But
 for those who may not, experiencing the quick and composed side-to-side
 direction changes while traveling at 75 mph (verified by my GPS data 
logger) through Cartagena’s chicane can be a very persuasive thing of 
beauty! Straight-line stability was steadfast along the 130-mph main 
straight, as well as during hard braking into the first turn. Three of 
the 15-turn circuit’s braking zones threw twists into the lap as the 
brakes needed to be applied while leaned over at around 100 mph and held
 on deep into the corner. The front Brembo setup provided all the power I
 could ask for approaching Turn 1, with the superb feel and sensitivity 
needed for breathless trail-braking.
These
 same harrowing corner entries showcased the benefit of the slipper 
clutch. When downshifting while leaned over, the back of the bike 
briefly stepped out of line but came right back without a hitch. 
The ABS
 offers two modes of operation, normal and circuit. Triumph insisted we 
ride in the latter mode as it’s calibrated for dry track use and 
overrides the normal mode’s anti-nose-wheelie control. You’d practically
 have to hit an oily patch or run off track for it to activate. The 
stock fitment Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa SP radials were so hooked up, 
the only time I felt the ABS engage was when I purposely stomped the 
rear pedal on pit lane to be certain it did in fact work.
At
 day’s end, I couldn’t agree more with Warburton’s sentiment. Right now,
 the Daytona 675 may well represent the zenith of refinement for a bike 
that eschews a digital ride-by-wire interface. Heck, even in this age of
 digital this and HD that, don’t most true audiophiles still prefer 
vinyl?

Fuel Efficieny: 46 MPG City / 50 MPG Highway
Engine: Liquid-cooled, 12 valve, DOHC, in-line 3-cylinder
Frame: Aluminum beam twin-spar
Rear Suspension: Öhlins TTX36 twin tube monoshock with piggy back reservoir, adjustable preload, rebound and compression damping, 130mm rear wheel travel
Instruments: LCD multi-functional instrument pack with digital speedometer, trip computer, analogue tachometer, lap timer, gear position indicator and programmable gear change lights



History 
Triumph
 Daytona 675 development started in 2000 following the launch of the 
TT600. The TT600 represented Triumph's first modern middle weight sports
 motorcycle. A decision was made to manufacture a machine closer aligned
 with traditional Triumph values. A notable technical decision was the 
selection of a three cylinder engine as the power plant, instead of the 
four cylinder used by the TT600 and the other 600 cc supersport 
motorcycles.[2]
In
 2001, soon after the completion of the similarly three cylinder powered
 Triumph Daytona 955i, Triumph began engineering analysis to work out 
weight, engine performance in horsepower and torque. Pleased with the 
figures, the project moved to the full concept phase in March 2002.
Triumph Daytona 675 in Tornado Red
Initial
 chassis development work was done using a chopped Daytona 600 chassis. 
Triumph moved the wheelbase, adjusted the head angle, and modified the 
tank. This new configuration exhibited better performance than the 
original Daytona 600, forming a basis to compare against competitive 
bikes such as the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R and Honda CBR600RR. While engine 
development had not been completed, computer aided chassis development 
continued with the data collected from these tests.
Design
 work for the Daytona 675 proceeded, producing a primarily black design 
based on the Daytona 600. However, this initial design was discarded as 
great British designs of the 1960s had "a flowing curved design - no 
sharp angular aggressive edges". A member of the engineering team 
produced a concept drawing of the 675 as a naked bike. Styling was based
 upon this concept drawing and that of the earlier T595 model. Styling 
development continued in house, staying close to spirit of earlier 
Triumph design. Market research groups made up of a variety of different
 classes of sportbike riders chose the latter design of bike which was 
refined and adopted for production.
The
 newly developed engine was first tested on a dynamometer in May 2003. 
Final development combining styling, engine, chassis into a prototype 
quickly followed. Prototype testing started in late 2004.
Daytona 675 with 2008 decals
Daytona 675 Special Edition
The
 Daytona 675 was officially launched at the NEC International Motorcycle
 and Scooter Show in 2005. UK-based Bike was given an exclusive test 
ride prior to the official launch, impressing the magazine test rider. 
The magazine declared it "the best British sportsbike ever" and 
"possibly one of the greatest sportsbikes of all time".
The Daytona 675 won the Supersport category for the Masterbike 2006 (finishing third overall), and won again in 2007.





Posted by :Andrea

 
 
Σχόλια
Δημοσίευση σχολίου